Journal of Applied Physiology AJP: Renal Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 63: 812-819, 1987;
8750-7587/87 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jenne, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Vestal, R. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jenne, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Vestal, R. E.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 63, Issue 2 812-819, Copyright © 1987 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

In vivo functional antagonism between isoproterenol and bronchoconstrictants in the dog

J. W. Jenne, T. K. Shaughnessy, W. S. Druz, C. J. Manfredi and R. E. Vestal
Medical Service, Edward Hines Jr., Veterans Administration Hospital, Hines, Illinois.

The functional antagonism between isoproterenol and methacholine, histamine and serotonin, as described in vitro in respiratory smooth muscle was explored in vivo in a canine model. Infusions of isoproterenol were administered during brief peaks of bronchospasm produced by aerosolized methacholine and histamine, or during sustained bronchospasm produced by infused serotonin. In eight mongrel dogs anesthetized with pentobarbital sodium, the mean protection by infused isoproterenol against methacholine challenge decreased from 60.6 to 29.1% as the mean lung resistance (RL) was increased from 78 to 232% over base line by a fourfold increase in methacholine (P less than 0.002). In six dogs, the mean protection by isoproterenol against histamine decreased from 55.5 to 26.9% as the opposing RL increased from 80 to 182% over base line with a fourfold increase in histamine (P less than 0.02). However, with serotonin infusions there was only a small 18% mean decrease in protection (P = 0.05), associated with a correspondingly small 37% mean increase in dose of serotonin despite a 269% mean increase in resistance (P = 0.02). In all cases, the loss of protection correlated more closely with the dose of constrictant than the resistance increase over base line. These findings demonstrate in vivo functional antagonism between isoproterenol and the dose of bronchoconstrictant but not necessarily resistance increase per se.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online