Journal of Applied Physiology Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 62: 2187-2192, 1987;
8750-7587/87 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ali, J.
Right arrow Articles by Duke, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ali, J.
Right arrow Articles by Duke, K.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 62, Issue 6 2187-2192, Copyright © 1987 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Does indomethacin affect shunt and its response to PEEP in oleic acid pulmonary edema?

J. Ali and K. Duke

We assessed hemodynamics, lobar perfusion, and shunts at base line 1.5 h after unilobar oleic acid edema, 15 min after indomethacin (10 mg/kg iv), and 15 min after positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) (10 cm) in 10 dogs. In 10 additional dogs (control) the same measurements were made but no indomethacin was administered. Shunts of the edematous lobe were: 10.6 +/- 6.3, 54.1 +/- 22.8, 30.8 +/- 16.6, and 12.4 +/- 6.3% for dogs administered indomethacin and 10.9 +/- 4.2, 53.8 +/- 13.1, 72.3 +/- 14.6, and 11.5 +/- 4.1% for the controls. Perfusions (% cardiac output) to the edematous lobe were 27.6 +/- 3.6, 14.6 +/- 2.0, 9.9 +/- 1.5, and 27.9 +/- 2.9% in the dogs administered indomethacin and 27.3 +/- 3.1, 14.0 +/- 1.7, 13.2 +/- 1.3, and 26.9 +/- 2.8% in controls. The decrease in lobar perfusion was similar before indomethacin with a further decrease in lobar perfusion and an increase in lobar vascular resistance 15 min after indomethacin. The increase in vascular resistance of the edematous lobe was three times that of nonedematous lobes after indomethacin (149.6 +/- 76% vs. 58.0 +/- 43%). Indomethacin, therefore, decreases shunt possibly by enhancing alveolar hypoxic vasoconstriction and does not block the improvement in shunt with PEEP.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online