|
|
||||||||
Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 62, Issue 2 668-672, Copyright © 1987 by American Physiological Society
ARTICLES |
D. P. Swain, J. R. Coast, P. S. Clifford, M. C. Milliken and J. Stray-Gundersen
Energy in bicycling is primarily expended to overcome air resistance, which is proportional to a cyclist's surface area (SA). Thus we hypothesized that large cyclists should have a lower O2 consumption normalized to body weight (VO2/BW) than small cyclists because of the former's lower SA/BW. We measured the VO2/BW of small (BW = 59.4 +/- 4.1 kg) and large (BW = 84.4 +/- 3.2 kg) cyclists while they bicycled on a flat road at 10, 15, and 20 mph. The large cyclists had a 22% lower VO2/BW than the small cyclists at all speeds. However, the SA/BW ratio of the large cyclists was only 11% lower than that of the small cyclists. We then photographically determined the frontal area (FA) of the cyclists in a racing posture, and found that the large cyclists had a 16% lower FA/BW ratio than the small cyclists. We conclude that large cyclists are at a distinct advantage, in terms of VO2/BW, while bicycling on level roads, and this advantage is principally due to their lower FA/BW ratio.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J G Seifert, D W Bacharach, E R Burke, M Langenfeld, and A C Snyder The physiological effects of cycling on tandem and single bicycles * Commentary * Commentary Br. J. Sports Med., February 1, 2003; 37(1): 50 - 53. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Padilla, I. Mujika, F. Angulo, and J. J. Goiriena Scientific approach to the 1-h cycling world record: a case study J Appl Physiol, October 1, 2000; 89(4): 1522 - 1527. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. C. Raasch and F. E. Zajac Locomotor Strategy for Pedaling: Muscle Groups and Biomechanical Functions J Neurophysiol, August 1, 1999; 82(2): 515 - 525. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |