Journal of Applied Physiology Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 61: 1647-1655, 1986;
8750-7587/86 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zin, W. A.
Right arrow Articles by Milic-Emili, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zin, W. A.
Right arrow Articles by Milic-Emili, J.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 61, Issue 5 1647-1655, Copyright © 1986 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Active and passive respiratory mechanics in anesthetized dogs

W. A. Zin, A. Boddener, P. R. Silva, T. M. Pinto and J. Milic-Emili

In six spontaneously breathing anesthetized dogs (pentobarbital sodium, 30 mg/kg) airflow, volume, and tracheal and esophageal pressures were measured. The active and passive mechanical properties of the total respiratory system, lung, and chest wall were calculated. The average passive values of respiratory system, lung, and chest wall elastances amounted to, respectively, 50.1, 32.3, and 17.7 cmH2O X l-1. Resistive pressure-vs.-flow relationships for the relaxed respiratory system, lung, and chest wall were also determined; a linear relationship was found for the former (the total passive intrinsic resistance averaged 4.1 cmH2O X l-1 X s), whereas power functions best described the others: the pulmonary pressure-flow relationship exhibited an upward concavity, which for the chest wall presented an upward convexity. The average active elastance and resistance of the respiratory system were, respectively, 64.0 cmH2O X l-1 and 5.4 cmH2O X l-1 X s. The greater active impedance reflects pressure losses due to force-length and force-velocity properties of the inspiratory muscles and those due to distortion of the respiratory system from its relaxed configuration.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online