Journal of Applied Physiology Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 61: 91-97, 1986;
8750-7587/86 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hida, W.
Right arrow Articles by Takishima, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hida, W.
Right arrow Articles by Takishima, T.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 61, Issue 1 91-97, Copyright © 1986 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Ventilatory response to phasic contraction and passive movement in graded anesthesia

W. Hida, C. Shindoh, Y. Kikuchi, T. Chonan, H. Inoue, H. Sasaki and T. Takishima

The ventilatory response to electrically induced contraction (EIC) and passive movement (PM) of hindlimb muscles at different levels of anesthesia was studied in 11 chloralose-urethan anesthetized dogs with and without rhizotomy. The level of anesthesia was assessed by corneal reflexes and measurements of the ventilatory response to hypercapnia. Muscle contraction was induced by electrically stimulating the peripheral cut ends of the sciatic and femoral nerves for 4-5 min, and PM was induced manually at the same frequency and amplitude as during EIC. In spinal intact dogs (n = 7), initial rapid increases in minute ventilation (VE) during EIC and PM were found in both light and deep anesthesia. Further increases in VE above the initial rise were seen during EIC but not PM. The initial rapid increases in VE did not differ between the two anesthetic levels. The steady-state ventilatory response during EIC decreased as anesthesia deepened but did not do so during PM. Rhizotomy (n = 4) abolished the initial rapid increase in VE during EIC and PM and the steady-state VE response to PM at both anesthetic levels. These results suggest that the transitional ventilatory response is neurally mediated from the muscles and not affected by the level of general anesthesia. Additionally, the anesthesia-induced reduction of ventilatory response may be due to depression of responsiveness to CO2 rather than to the inspiratory motoneuron pathway.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online