Journal of Applied Physiology Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

J Appl Physiol 61: 1-6, 1986;
8750-7587/86 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gallego, J.
Right arrow Articles by Jacquemin, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gallego, J.
Right arrow Articles by Jacquemin, C.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 61, Issue 1 1-6, Copyright © 1986 by American Physiological Society

ARTICLES

Retention of ventilatory pattern learning in normal subjects

J. Gallego, J. Ankaoua, M. Lethielleux, B. Chambille, G. Vardon and C. Jacquemin

Two procedures for training normal subjects to increase inspiratory duration (TI) were compared. In the first procedure (feedback), a visual signal informed subjects of their TI value just after the end of each inspiration; subjects were instructed to maintain TI for a set interval previously established by the experimenter. The second procedure (pacing) consisted of delivering a periodic signal to subjects and instructing them to adjust their respiratory frequency to this signal. All subjects participated in two identical sessions, 24 h apart. Comparison of performances between the two sessions provides evidence for a retention effect in feedback subjects only, suggesting the superiority of this method. Voluntary increase of TI during training induced a spontaneous increase of tidal volume, independent of any instruction. This increase in breathing amplitude cannot be explained in terms of chemical control of breathing.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Behav ModifHome page
R. Ley
The Modification of Breathing Behavior: Pavlovian and Operant Control in Emotion and Cognition
Behav Modif, July 1, 1999; 23(3): 441 - 479.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 NeurologyHome page
J. Vissing, H. Galbo, and R. G. Haller
Paradoxically enhanced glucose production during exercise in humans with blocked glycolysis caused by muscle phosphofructokinase deficiency
Neurology, September 1, 1996; 47(3): 766 - 771.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online