Journal of Applied Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 60: 1482-1492, 1986;
8750-7587/86 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Im Hof, V.
Right arrow Articles by Younes, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Im Hof, V.
Right arrow Articles by Younes, M.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 60, Issue 5 1482-1492, Copyright © 1986 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Steady-state response of quadriplegic subjects to inspiratory resistive load

V. Im Hof, H. Dubo, V. Daniels and M. Younes

Normal subjects preserve tidal volume (VT) in the face of added inspiratory resistance by increasing maximal amplitude and duration of the rising phase of respiratory driving pressure (DP) and by changing the shape of this phase to one that is more concave to the time axis. To explore the possible role of chest wall afferents in mediating these responses, we determined averaged DP in eight quadriplegic subjects during steady-state unloaded breathing and while breathing through an inspiratory resistance (8.5 cmH2O X 1(-1) X s). As with normal subjects, quadriplegics preserved VT (loaded VT = 106% control) by utilizing all three mechanisms. However, prolongation of the inspiratory duration derived from the DP waveform (+22% vs. +42%) and shape response were significantly less in the quadriplegic subjects. Shape response was completely absent in subjects with C4 lesions. The results provide strong evidence that respiratory muscle spindles are responsible for shape response and that changes in afferent feedback from the chest wall play an important role in mediating inspiratory prolongation.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online