Journal of Applied Physiology http://www.adinstruments.com/labchart/faseb
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 60: 479-485, 1986;
8750-7587/86 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jammes, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Grimaud, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jammes, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Grimaud, C.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 60, Issue 2 479-485, Copyright © 1986 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Role of vagal and spinal sensory pathways on eupneic diaphragmatic activity

Y. Jammes, M. J. Mathiot, S. Delpierre and C. Grimaud

The interactions between vagal and spinal afferents in the control of eupneic diaphragmatic activity were studied in two groups of cats anesthetized either with pentobarbital sodium (SPB) or with ethyl carbamate-alpha-chloralose (ECC), which enhanced spinal reflexes. Under both conditions of anesthesia two experimental protocols were performed: 1) bilateral cervical vagotomy followed by spinal section at C8 level or 2) spinal section followed by vagotomy. Changes in integrated diaphragmatic activity (Edi) were studied during eupneic ventilation and tracheal occlusion at end expiration. Vagotomy always significantly increased the amplitude of Edi during eupnea (SPB + 30%; ECC + 15%) and prolonged its duration (Tdi) (SPB + 110%; ECC + 75%) but did not modify the overall shape of the Edi vs. time relationship. Spinal section induced reverse changes in the amplitude of Edi, whether vagal afferents were present or suppressed and modified the shape of the Edi wave, but did not significantly modify Tdi. These results indicate that both vagal and spinal afferents may participate in the control of eupneic inspiration but exert different and interdependent influences on the recruitment and firing time of phrenic motoneurons. In addition, Tdi measured during tracheal occlusion (Todi) was markedly prolonged under ECC anesthesia. In this situation spinal section reduced Todi, which became close to the values obtained in intact or spinal cats under SPB anesthesia. Thus the response to tracheal occlusion at end expiration cannot be interpreted as resulting from the sole suppression of volume related vagal information.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online