Journal of Applied Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 59: 1752-1756, 1985;
8750-7587/85 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kelling, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Altose, M. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kelling, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Altose, M. D.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 59, Issue 6 1752-1756, Copyright © 1985 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Respiratory responses to ventilatory loading following low cervical spinal cord injury

J. S. Kelling, A. F. DiMarco, S. B. Gottfried and M. D. Altose

This study compared the respiratory responses to ventilatory loading in 8 normal subjects and 11 quadriplegic patients with low cervical spinal cord transection. Progressive hypercapnia was produced by rebreathing. Rebreathing trials were carried out with no added load and with inspiratory resistive loads of 5 and 16 cmH2O. l-1 X s. Measurements were made of ventilation and of diaphragmatic electromyographic activity. Base-line hypercapnic ventilatory responses were significantly lower than normal in the quadriplegic patients, but the effects of resistive loading on the ventilatory responses were comparable in the two groups. The change in peak moving-average diaphragmatic electrical activity (DI peak) for a given change in CO2 partial pressure (PCO2) and DI peak at PCO2 55 Torr increased significantly with resistive loading both in the normal subjects and the quadriplegic patients. In the normal subjects, but not in the quadriplegic patients, inspiratory duration increased progressively with increasing resistance. The increase in DI peak during ventilatory loading in the normal subjects was a consequence of inspiratory prolongation. In contrast, in the quadriplegic patients during breathing against the larger resistive load, there was a significant increase in the average rate of rise (DI peak divided by the time from onset to peak) of diaphragmatic activity. The change in DI rate of rise for a given change in PCO2 increased to 137 +/- 13% (SE), and the DI rate of rise at PCO2 55 Torr increased to 128 +/- 8% (SE) of control values. These results indicate that compensatory increases in diaphragmatic activation during ventilatory loading occur in quadriplegic patients in whom afferent feedback from rib cage receptors is disrupted.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online