Journal of Applied Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 59: 722-731, 1985;
8750-7587/85 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shaw, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by Greene, E. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shaw, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by Greene, E. R.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 59, Issue 3 722-731, Copyright © 1985 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Noninvasive Doppler determination of cardiac output during submaximal and peak exercise

J. G. Shaw, E. C. Johnson, W. F. Voyles and E. R. Greene

We compared pulsed Doppler (PD) measurements of stroke volume (SV) and cardiac output (CO) as a function of work load with previously reported values that were obtained by standard invasive methods. Suprasternal notch measurements of Doppler-shifted frequency (delta f) were obtained from the ascending aorta and SV calculated with the Doppler equation and an independent measurement of aortic diameter. Motion artifacts were minimized with the aid of a restraining table cycle ergometer. Signal aliasing was accommodated with manual summation of delta f waveforms. A total of 207 determinations were made in 10 sitting subjects exercising to exhaustion. Linear regression analysis of CO vs. work load was significant (P less than 0.001). The correlation coefficient (r = 0.95) and standard error of estimate value (1.21 1/min) were similar to values from the literature. Absolute values of CO and SV underestimated the literature values across all work loads. Technical reproducibility was assessed by comparing with paired t tests the differences between 65 duplicate serial measurements of CO and SV at rest and exercise. No significant differences (P less than 0.001) were found. We concluded that PD-determined SV and CO are reproducible and correlate linearly with work load in a manner consistent with reported invasive techniques. Thus the PD method appears suitable for use during submaximal and peak exercise.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online