Journal of Applied Physiology Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 59: 28-33, 1985;
8750-7587/85 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pyszczynski, D.
Right arrow Articles by Anthonisen, N. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pyszczynski, D.
Right arrow Articles by Anthonisen, N. R.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 59, Issue 1 28-33, Copyright © 1985 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Increased gravitational stress does not alter maximum expiratory flow

D. Pyszczynski, S. N. Mink and N. R. Anthonisen

We measured maximum expiratory flow-volume (MEFV) curves in six seated subjects during normal (+1 Gz) and increased (+2 and +3 Gz) gravitational stress. Full MEFV curves, initiated at total lung capacity, were recorded, as were partial MEFV curves, initiated at approximately 60% of the vital capacity. Data were acquired in all subjects breathing air at +1 and +2 Gz; results were available for three subjects breathing 80% He-20% O2 at +1 and +2 Gz, and in two subjects, results were obtained at +3 Gz. Changes in gravitational stress were not associated with changes of either full or partial MEFV curves. The known increase in differences of regional lung volume and recoil caused by increased gravitational stress did not influence maximum expiratory flow. Though increased gravitational stress probably changed regional emptying sequences little during full MEFV maneuvers, substantial changes of emptying sequence were expected during partial maneuvers. It is possible that such changes in emptying sequence occurred but were not associated with changes in maximum flow because the latter was determined by choking in central airways common to all regions.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online