Journal of Applied Physiology AJP: Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 58: 2020-2026, 1985;
8750-7587/85 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hussain, S. N.
Right arrow Articles by Pardy, R. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hussain, S. N.
Right arrow Articles by Pardy, R. L.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 58, Issue 6 2020-2026, Copyright © 1985 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Effects of separate rib cage and abdominal restriction on exercise performance in normal humans

S. N. Hussain, B. Rabinovitch, P. T. Macklem and R. L. Pardy

We assessed the effects of selective restriction of movements of the rib cage (Res,rc) and abdomen (Res,ab) on ventilatory pattern, transdiaphragmatic pressure (Pdi), and electrical activity of the diaphragm (Edi) in five normal subjects exercising at a constant work rate (80% of maximum power output) on a cycle ergometer till exhaustion. Restriction of movements was achieved by an inelastic corset applied tightly around the rib cage or abdomen. Edi was recorded by an esophageal electrode, rectified, and then integrated, and peak values during inspiration were measured. Each subject exercised at the same work rate on 3 days: with Res,rc, with Res,ab, and without restriction (control). Res,rc but not Res,ab reduced exercise time (tlim). Up to tlim, minute ventilation (VE) was similar in all three conditions. At any level of VE, however, Res,rc decreased tidal volume and inspiratory and expiratory time, whereas Res,ab had no effect on the pattern of breathing. Res,ab was associated with higher inspiratory Pdi swings at any level of VE, whereas peak Edi was similar to control. Inspiratory Pdi swings were the same with Res,rc as control, but the peak Edi for a given Pdi was greater with Res,rc (P less than 0.05). During Res,rc the abdominal pressure swings in expiration were greater than with Res,ab and control. We conclude that Res,rc altered the pattern of breathing in normal subjects in high-intensity exercise, decreased diaphragmatic contractility, increased abdominal muscle recruitment in expiration, and reduced tlim. On the other hand, Res,ab had no effect on breathing pattern or tlim but was associated with increased diaphragmatic contractility.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
J. D. Miller, K. C. Beck, M. J. Joyner, A. G. Brice, and B. D. Johnson
Cardiorespiratory effects of inelastic chest wall restriction
J Appl Physiol, June 1, 2002; 92(6): 2419 - 2428.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
S. O'Connor, P. McLoughlin, C. G. Gallagher, and H. R. Harty
Ventilatory response to incremental and constant-workload exercise in the presence of a thoracic restriction
J Appl Physiol, December 1, 2000; 89(6): 2179 - 2186.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
S. GRASSO, F. PUNTILLO, L. MASCIA, G. ANCONA, T. FIORE, F. BRUNO, A. S. SLUTSKY, and V. MARCO RANIERI
Compensation for Increase in Respiratory Workload during Mechanical Ventilation . Pressure-Support versus Proportional-Assist Ventilation
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., March 1, 2000; 161(3): 819 - 826.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
H. R. Harty, D. R. Corfield, R. M. Schwartzstein, and L. Adams
External thoracic restriction, respiratory sensation, and ventilation during exercise in men
J Appl Physiol, April 1, 1999; 86(4): 1142 - 1150.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online