Journal of Applied Physiology Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 58: 1818-1822, 1985;
8750-7587/85 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mahler, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Loke, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mahler, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Loke, J.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 58, Issue 6 1818-1822, Copyright © 1985 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Volumetric responses of right and left ventricles during upright exercise in normal subjects

D. A. Mahler, R. A. Matthay, P. E. Snyder, L. Pytlik, B. L. Zaret and J. Loke

We evaluated the volumetric responses of the right and left ventricles to upright exercise using two noninvasive methods, first-pass radionuclide angiocardiography and the CO2 rebreathing technique, in nine normal subjects. Right (RV) and left (LV) ventricular ejection fractions, heart rate, and cardiac index were determined at rest and during steady-state exercise on the bicycle ergometer at 50% of maximal O2 consumption. From these data, stroke volume index (SVI), end-diastolic volume index (EDVI), and end-systolic volume index (ESVI) were derived. SVI increased from 40 +/- 7 ml/m2 at rest to 59 +/- 13 ml/m2 with exercise (P less than 0.001). RVEDVI increased significantly from 82 +/- 16 ml/m2 at rest to 95 +/- 21 ml/m2 during exercise (P = 0.008), while there was no significant change in RVESVI with exercise. Changes in LVEDVI and LVESVI during upright exercise were similar to the right ventricle. The increase in systolic blood pressure during exercise, along with no change in LVESVI, indicated enhanced ventricular contractility. The normal augmentation in SVI during submaximal exercise was due to both the Frank-Starling mechanism and an increased contractile state. Application of these or similar techniques may be useful in evaluating ventricular performance in patients with cardiorespiratory dysfunction.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online