Journal of Applied Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 58: 1528-1535, 1985;
8750-7587/85 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Adair, T. H.
Right arrow Articles by Guyton, A. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Adair, T. H.
Right arrow Articles by Guyton, A. C.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 58, Issue 5 1528-1535, Copyright © 1985 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Measurement of subcutaneous tissue fluid pressure using a skin-cup method

T. H. Adair and A. C. Guyton

We developed a new method for measuring tissue fluid pressure in subcutaneous tissue. Porous Teflon cylinders were permanently implanted subcutaneously into the inguinal area of 10 dogs, and after several weeks a skin concavity formed in the center of each of the cylinders. A small needle attached to a recording system was inserted into the free tissue fluid lining the concavity, and the tissue fluid pressure averaged -8.8 +/- 2.7 (SD) mmHg. Next, a hollow Plexiglas cup was placed over the concavity and glued to the skin. The air pressure in the skin cup was continually adjusted (using an electromechanical servo-control system) to pull the skin upward and to hold it perfectly flat across the upper ridge of the Teflon cylinder. The simultaneously recorded needle and cup pressures averaged -9.1 +/- 2.4 and -8.6 +/- 2.6 mmHg, respectively, during steady-state conditions with the skin in a flat position. Both pressures also responded appropriately to dynamic changes in tissue fluid pressure caused by increasing and decreasing the volume of the free tissue fluid. Because the skin was flat, the equivalences of pressures above and below the skin is consistent with the hypothesis that the skin was not tethered significantly to the underlying tissues and that cup pressure accurately estimates the tissue free fluid pressure.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online