Journal of Applied Physiology Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

J Appl Physiol 58: 1099-1106, 1985;
8750-7587/85 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DeWeese, E. L.
Right arrow Articles by Yu, P. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by DeWeese, E. L.
Right arrow Articles by Yu, P. L.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 58, Issue 4 1099-1106, Copyright © 1985 by American Physiological Society

ARTICLES

Ventilatory response to high-frequency airway oscillation in humans

E. L. DeWeese, T. Y. Sullivan and P. L. Yu

To investigate respiratory control during high-frequency oscillation (HFO), ventilation was monitored in conscious humans by respiratory inductive plethysmography during application at the mouth of high-frequency pressure oscillations. Studies were conducted before and after airway and pharyngeal anesthesia. During HFO, breathing became slow and deep with an increase in tidal volume (VT) of 37% (P less than 0.01) and inspiratory duration (TI) of 34% (P less than 0.01). Timing ratio (TI/TT) increased 14% (P less than 0.05) and respiratory frequency (f) decreased 12% (P less than 0.01). Mean inspiratory flow (VT/TI) did not change during HFO. Following airway anesthesia, VT increased only 26% during HFO (P less than 0.01), whereas significant changes in TI, TI/TT, and f were not observed. Pharyngeal anesthesia failed to diminish the effect of HFO on TI, TT, or f, although the increase in VT was reduced. These results indicate that 1) HFO presented in this manner alters inspiratory timing without affecting the level of inspiratory activity, and 2) receptors in the larynx and/or lower airways may in part mediate the response.




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online