Journal of Applied Physiology Watch the video to see how APS reaches out to developing nations.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 58: 582-591, 1985;
8750-7587/85 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rosenthal, F. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rosenthal, F. S.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 58, Issue 2 582-591, Copyright © 1985 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

A model for determining alveolar and small airway dimensions from aerosol recovery data

F. S. Rosenthal

A mathematical model is presented that allows the determination of alveolar and small airway dimensions from a series of aerosol recovery measurements performed at different inspiration volumes. The model assumes 1) a symmetric dichotomous lung, 2) representation of airway and alveoli as ensembles of straight tubes, and 3) Gaussian dispersion of the aerosol bolus. Calculations with this model using dimensions given by Weibel show general agreement with experimental data on six human subjects obtained by Palmes et al. (J. Appl. Physiol. 34: 356-360, 1973). Close agreement is found by varying two parameters describing alveolar size and airway size to obtain the best fit. The resulting estimates of size are almost independent of the choice of the dispersion coefficient; however, the estimate of alveolar size is quite dependent on the form of settling assumed during breath holding. The values of alveolar diameter in the six subjects, determined under the assumption of stirred settling, ranged from 0.13 to 0.33 mm, whereas under the assumption of still settling the range was 0.24-0.65 mm. Small airway (generations 18-24) dimensions ranged from 0.41 to 0.66 mm under the still-settling assumption and 0.39 to 0.63 mm under the stirred-settling assumption. With the assumption of an intermediate (partially stirred) form of settling, the alveolar diameter in the six subjects is 0.28 +/- 0.02 mm, in close agreement with morphometric measurements by other investigators. A partially stirred form of settling is also consistent with model predictions of recovery vs. breath-holding time and with cardiogenic gas mixing in the lung.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online