Journal of Applied Physiology Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 58: 285-289, 1985;
8750-7587/85 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Behrakis, P. K.
Right arrow Articles by Milic-Emili, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Behrakis, P. K.
Right arrow Articles by Milic-Emili, J.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 58, Issue 1 285-289, Copyright © 1985 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Partitioning of respiratory mechanics in halothane-anesthetized humans

P. K. Behrakis, B. D. Higgs, D. R. Bevan and J. Milic-Emili

In five spontaneously breathing anesthetized subjects [halothane approximately 1 minimal alveolar concentration (MAC), 70% N2O, 30% O2], flow, changes in lung volume, and esophageal and airway opening pressure were measured in order to partition the elastance (Ers) and flow resistance (Rrs) of the total respiratory system into the lung and chest wall components. Ers averaged (+/- SD) 23.0 +/- 4.9 cmH2O X l-1, while the corresponding values of pulmonary (EL) and chest wall (EW) elastance were 14.3 +/- 3.2 and 8.7 +/- 3.0 cmH2O X l-1, respectively. Intrinsic Rrs (upper airways excluded) averaged 2.3 +/- 0.2 cmH2O X l-1 X s, the corresponding values for pulmonary (RL) and chest wall (RW) flow resistance amounting to 0.8 +/- 0.4 and 1.5 +/- 0.5 cmH2O X l-1 X s, respectively. Ers increased relative to normal values in awake state, mainly reflecting increased EL. Rw was higher than previous estimates on awake seated subjects (approximately 1.0 cmH2O X l-1 X s). RL was relatively low, reflecting the fact that the subjects had received atropine (0.3-0.6 mg) and were breathing N2O. This is the first study in which both respiratory elastic and flow-resistive properties have been partitioned into lung and chest wall components in anesthetized humans.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
I. de Chazal and R. D. Hubmayr
Novel aspects of pulmonary mechanics in intensive care
Br. J. Anaesth., July 1, 2003; 91(1): 81 - 91.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online