Journal of Applied Physiology Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 57: 1347-1353, 1984;
8750-7587/84 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van Lunteren, E.
Right arrow Articles by Cherniack, N. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by van Lunteren, E.
Right arrow Articles by Cherniack, N. S.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 57, Issue 5 1347-1353, Copyright © 1984 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Effects of CO2 and bronchoconstriction on costal and crural diaphragm electromyograms

E. van Lunteren, M. A. Haxhiu, E. C. Deal Jr, D. Perkins and N. S. Cherniack

To determine if neural control of the crural diaphragm is similar to that of the costal diaphragm, electrical activity was recorded from these two parts of the diaphragm in 10 anesthetized dogs during resting O2 breathing and during progressive hyperoxic hypercapnia. Within a breath, the onset of crural diaphragm inspiratory activity started significantly earlier than that of the costal diaphragm under both resting and CO2 stimulated conditions, although the relative delay in costal diaphragm activity was smaller during hypercapnia than during resting O2 breathing. Following hyperventilation to apnea, both parts of the diaphragm resumed activity on the same breath. During CO2 rebreathing, the maximal increase in crural diaphragm peak electrical activity was significantly greater than that of the costal diaphragm. We also examined the effects of histamine-induced bronchoconstriction on diaphragm activity. Following administration of histamine aerosol there was a transient of irregular breathing during which in three animals costal diaphragm activity became nearly quiet, although there was continued activity of the crural diaphragm. Once breathing became more regular, there was a significantly greater stimulation of crural diaphragm than costal diaphragm activity; this difference persisted for 15 min after histamine inhalation. These results support the concept that electrical activity can be distributed nonuniformly to the costal and crural diaphragm and demonstrate that the crural diaphragm has a greater gain with hypercapnia and bronchoconstriction than does the costal diaphragm.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
C. Sinderby, J. Beck, J. Spahija, J. Weinberg, and A. Grassino
Voluntary activation of the human diaphragm in health and disease
J Appl Physiol, December 1, 1998; 85(6): 2146 - 2158.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
A. B. Sprikkelman, L. A. Van Eykern, M. S. Lourens, H. S. A. Heymans, and W. M. C. Van Aalderen
Respiratory muscle activity in the assessment of bronchial responsiveness in asthmatic children
J Appl Physiol, March 1, 1998; 84(3): 897 - 901.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online