Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 57, Issue 3 777-787, Copyright © 1984 by American Physiological Society

ARTICLES

Reproducibility and accuracy of airway area by acoustic reflection

L. J. Brooks, R. G. Castile, G. M. Glass, N. T. Griscom, M. E. Wohl and J. J. Fredberg

To determine the accuracy and reproducibility of measurements of airway area by acoustic reflection (AAAR) we made repeated measurements of tracheal areas in human volunteers, glass airway models, and excised canine tracheae. In 10 adult males, the mean ratio of tracheal AAAR to tracheal areas determined roentgenographically was not significantly different from one (1.06 +/- 0.13 SD). Within-run variability was 10 +/- 4% (CV), mean intrasubject day-to-day variability was 9 +/- 4% (CV). A custom-made mouthpiece is necessary for accurate measurements of AAAR. Mean variability related to differences in mouthpiece construction was 7 +/- 6% (CV). The effect of variations in upper airway and glottic sizes on tracheal AAAR measurements was investigated using glass airway models. In model studies, tracheal AAAR measurements were found to be independent of changes in proximal airway size for glottic apertures greater than or equal to 1 cm2 and upper airway areas less than or equal to 8 cm2. Tracheal area was, however, overestimated by 20% in the rigid-walled glass models. The effects of airway wall rigidity were qualitatively investigated by comparing acoustic and roentgenographic measurements of excised canine tracheae surrounded by either air or petroleum jelly. Differences in the accuracy of measurements of AAAR in vitro and in vivo are probably due to differences in airway wall inertance. These studies suggest that the measurement of AAAR yields an accurate and reproducible result that may be clinically useful for the noninvasive detection of changes in central airway geometry.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. Busetto, G. Enzi, E. M. Inelmen, G. Costa, V. Negrin, G. Sergi, and A. Vianello Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome in Morbid Obesity: Effects of Intragastric Balloon Chest, August 1, 2005; 128(2): 618 - 623. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Gozal and M. M. Burnside Increased Upper Airway Collapsibility in Children with Obstructive Sleep Apnea during Wakefulness Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., January 15, 2004; 169(2): 163 - 167. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. A. Ochroch and D. M. Eckmann Clinical Application of Acoustic Reflectometry in Predicting the Difficult Airway Anesth. Analg., September 1, 2002; 95(3): 645 - 649. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Louis, R. Fodil, S. Jaber, J. Pigeot, P.-H. Jarreau, F. Lofaso, and D. Isabey Dual assessment of airway area profile and respiratory input impedance from a single transient wave J Appl Physiol, February 1, 2001; 90(2): 630 - 637. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Terheyden, S. Maune, J. Mertens, and O. Hilberg Acoustic rhinometry: validation by three-dimensionally reconstructed computer tomographic scans J Appl Physiol, September 1, 2000; 89(3): 1013 - 1021. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Huang, N. Itai, T. Hoshiba, T. Fukunaga, K. Yamanouchi, H. Toga, K. Takahashi, and N. Ohya A new nasal acoustic reflection technique to estimate pharyngeal cross-sectional area during sleep J Appl Physiol, April 1, 2000; 88(4): 1457 - 1466. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Beaumont, R. Fodil, D. Isabey, F. Lofaso, D. Touchard, A. Harf, and B. Louis Gravity effects on upper airway area and lung volumes during parabolic flight J Appl Physiol, May 1, 1998; 84(5): 1639 - 1645. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				O. Hilberg, B. Lyholm, A. Michelsen, O. F. Pedersen, and O. Jacobsen Acoustic reflections during rhinometry: spatial resolution and sound loss J Appl Physiol, March 1, 1998; 84(3): 1030 - 1039. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. F. Coleman and G. L. Schechter A Basic Model to Study Acoustic Evaluation of Airway Obstruction Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, October 1, 1991; 117(10): 1144 - 1149. [Abstract] [PDF]