Journal of Applied Physiology Journal of Neurophysiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

J Appl Physiol 57: 34-39, 1984;
8750-7587/84 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jackson, A. C.
Right arrow Articles by Kotlikoff, M. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jackson, A. C.
Right arrow Articles by Kotlikoff, M. I.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 57, Issue 1 34-39, Copyright © 1984 by American Physiological Society

ARTICLES

Respiratory system, lung, and chest wall impedances in anesthetized dogs

A. C. Jackson, J. W. Watson and M. I. Kotlikoff

We measured impedances of the respiratory system (Zrs) and lung (ZL) in anesthetized and paralyzed dogs at frequencies between 4 and 64 Hz. Zrs was measured at functional residual capacity (FRC) and with mean transpulmonary pressures (Ptp) of 12 and 30 cmH2O; ZL was measured with the chest wall open at FRC and Ptp = 12 cmH2O. From these data we derived chest wall impedances at FRC and 12 cmH2O. Effective resistances of the respiratory system, lung, and chest wall were all frequency dependent. At frequencies below 22 Hz frequency dependence of respiratory system resistance was due to the frequency dependence of the chest wall, whereas at higher frequencies it was due to frequency dependence of the lung. Analysis of the impedance data between 4 and 32 Hz provided estimates of resistance, inertance, and compliance of the lung, chest wall, and respiratory system. At FRC, 41% of the respiratory system resistance was due to the lung and 59% was associated with the chest wall. Nearly all of the respiratory inertance (98%) was due to the lung. Lung compliance was approximately twice that of the chest wall, the former accounting for approximately one-third of respiratory elasticity. As lung volume was increased, respiratory resistance and compliance decreased; inertance also decreased, although this change was not significant.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Exp. Biol.Home page
P. Nassar, A. Jackson, and D. Carrier
Entraining the natural frequencies of running and breathing in guinea fowl (Numida meleagris)
J. Exp. Biol., May 1, 2001; 204(9): 1641 - 1651.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
J. B. Madwed and A. C. Jackson
Determination of airway and tissue resistances after antigen and methacholine in nonhuman primates
J Appl Physiol, November 1, 1997; 83(5): 1690 - 1696.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online