Journal of Applied Physiology Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 56: 1659-1665, 1984;
8750-7587/84 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hudgel, D. W.
Right arrow Articles by Robertson, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hudgel, D. W.
Right arrow Articles by Robertson, D.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 56, Issue 6 1659-1665, Copyright © 1984 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Accuracy of tidal volume, lung volume, and flow measurements by inductance vest in COPD patients

D. W. Hudgel, M. Capehart, B. Johnson, P. Hill and D. Robertson

We analyzed the accuracy of the inductance vest in measuring several ventilatory parameters in five patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We assessed tidal volume (VT) accuracy at different respiratory frequencies in different lying body positions with different thoracic and abdominal contributions to breathing and the accuracy over a 4-h time span. Mean percent error was calculated without regard to direction of error. The mean error of vest VT estimation was 7.6% for all body positions studied and 5.6% for right and left lateral positions combined. Vest VT accuracy was unchanged after 4 h and with changes in thoracic and abdominal contributions to VT. The mean errors for inspiratory and expiratory times were 3.3 and 2.0%, respectively. Volume was differentiated to flow. For respiratory rates ranging from 12 to 30 breaths/min, the mean error of the vest and our differentiation circuit in duplicating peak flows measured at the mouth was 3.5%. The ability of the vest to estimate changes in end-expiratory position or functional residual capacity was not as good as with VT; the mean error was 30.7%. For estimation of VT, ventilatory timing, and airflow in COPD patients, the inductance vest performs well. For measurement of changes in lung volume, improvements in vest design need to be made.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
T. Brack, A. Jubran, F. Laghi, and M. J. Tobin
Fluctuations in End-Expiratory Lung Volume during Cheyne-Stokes Respiration
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., June 15, 2005; 171(12): 1408 - 1413.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online