Journal of Applied Physiology Journal of Applied Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 56: 1308-1313, 1984;
8750-7587/84 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DeWeese, E. L.
Right arrow Articles by Yu, P. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by DeWeese, E. L.
Right arrow Articles by Yu, P. L.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 56, Issue 5 1308-1313, Copyright © 1984 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Neuromuscular response to resistive unloading: helium vs. bronchodilation

E. L. DeWeese, T. Y. Sullivan and P. L. Yu

To evaluate the neuromuscular response to resistive unloading, we compared the ventilatory and occlusion pressure (P100) response of normal subjects breathing 20.9% O2 in helium (He-O2) with their response to unloading produced by inhaled atropine sulfate. During He-O2 breathing airway resistance (Raw) fell by 49% of the base-line value on air, and P100 decreased by 20.8%. Minute ventilation, tidal volume, respiratory frequency, end-tidal Pco2, inspiratory and expiratory duration, and mean inspiratory flow were not significantly different when air was replaced by He-O2. In contrast, although atropine reduced Raw by an equivalent amount, there was no change in P100. Atropine had no significant effect on other respiratory variables, although a trend toward higher minute ventilation was noted. Fowler dead space increased after atropine but was not affected by He-O2. We conclude that, unlike He-O2 unloading, atropine unloading does not cause a reduction in occlusion pressure. This may be due to the effect of atropine on anatomical dead space which stimulates ventilation sufficiently to offset the fall in neuromuscular output due to resistive unloading.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
B. S. Krishnan, R. E. Clemens, T. A. Zintel, M. J. Stockwell, and C. G. Gallagher
Ventilatory response to helium-oxygen breathing during exercise: effect of airway anesthesia
J Appl Physiol, July 1, 1997; 83(1): 82 - 88.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online