Journal of Applied Physiology Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 56: 1302-1307, 1984;
8750-7587/84 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Boysen, T. C.
Right arrow Articles by Sato, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Boysen, T. C.
Right arrow Articles by Sato, K.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 56, Issue 5 1302-1307, Copyright © 1984 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

A modified anaerobic method of sweat collection

T. C. Boysen, S. Yanagawa, F. Sato and K. Sato

In an attempt to devise a method for collecting large volumes of thermally induced sweat with less epidermal contamination and evaporative water loss, we developed an anaerobic sweat collector by using a sheet of polyethylene film placed over a thin layer of Vaseline and paraffin oil on the skin. To test the validity of the new method, sweat samples collected every 5 min from the new collector (sweat A) were compared with those obtained from a second collector using no oil (sweat B) and scraped sweat for concentrations of adenosine 3',5'-cyclic monophosphate (cAMP), protein, glucose, urea, lactic acid, calcium, sodium, potassium, and cholesterol. The concentration of sweat ingredients in scraped sweat was often far greater than could be expected from evaporative water loss alone. When compared with sweat A, sweat B also had higher concentrations of these ingredients in the initial samples, indicating epidermal contamination, which was especially marked in cAMP, protein, urea, cholesterol, and calcium. Concomitant with a rise in plasma glucose following the administration of a glucose bolus, the sweat glucose significantly increased, indicating the plasma as a major source of sweat glucose. We conclude that the new sweat collector is instrumental in collecting large volumes of the cleanest possible human sweat.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online