Journal of Applied Physiology Journal of Neurophysiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

J Appl Physiol 56: 1162-1169, 1984;
8750-7587/84 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hurewitz, A. N.
Right arrow Articles by Chanana, A. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hurewitz, A. N.
Right arrow Articles by Chanana, A. D.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 56, Issue 5 1162-1169, Copyright © 1984 by American Physiological Society

ARTICLES

How alterations in pleural pressure influence esophageal pressure

A. N. Hurewitz, U. Sidhu, E. H. Bergofsky and A. D. Chanana

Although esophageal pressures have been substituted for direct pleural pressure measurement in humans, we have investigated the validity of this approach under circumstances when left and right pleural pressures are not equal. Esophageal and bilateral pleural pressures in awake sheep were compared by using matched balloon catheters in close proximity. In standing sheep, both end-expiratory pressures and inspiratory pressure swings were similar in all three catheter systems. However, when pleural pressures were made unequal, as during lateral recumbency or unilateral pneumothorax, the esophageal pressure reflected predominantly the right pleural pressure. These results suggest that esophageal pressures are useful estimates of pleural pressure under normal conditions when pleural pressures are equal bilaterally. However, the usefulness of esophageal pressures is limited in the presence of unilateral pneumothorax or other conditions where left and right pleural pressures are unequal. In the lateral decubitus position, positive end-expiratory pleural pressures were consistently observed. This was believed to be due to a combination of contraction of expiratory muscles, rapid respiratory rate resulting in insufficient expiratory time to reach an equilibrium pressure, and increased airways resistance resulting from compression of the dependent lung by the abdominal viscera. A single study in a paralyzed ventilated sheep showed less positive expiratory pressures, which were further reduced to zero or less when the respiratory rate was slowed to 10 breaths/min.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
H. Imanaka, W. R. Kimball, J. C. Wain, M. Nishimura, K. Okubo, D. Hess, and R. M. Kacmarek
Recovery of diaphragmatic function in awake sheep after two approaches to thoracic surgery
J Appl Physiol, November 1, 1997; 83(5): 1733 - 1740.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online