Journal of Applied Physiology AJP: Heart and Circulatory Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 56: 737-745, 1984;
8750-7587/84 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van Lunteren, E.
Right arrow Articles by Cherniack, N. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by van Lunteren, E.
Right arrow Articles by Cherniack, N. S.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 56, Issue 3 737-745, Copyright © 1984 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Effects of dopamine, isoproterenol, and lobeline on cranial and phrenic motoneurons

E. van Lunteren, M. A. Haxhiu, J. Mitra and N. S. Cherniack

Recent studies have suggested that the upper airway muscles receive a substantial portion of their excitatory input from the peripheral chemoreceptors. We examined the responses of the phrenic, hypoglossal, and recurrent laryngeal nerves to agents that are known to modify carotid body activity. Dopamine, an inhibitor, and isoproterenol and lobeline, two stimulators of carotid body activity, were administered into the lingual arteries of 14 anesthetized, paralyzed cats artificially ventilated with 100% O2. Dopamine decreased the activity of all three nerves (P less than 0.001) but inhibited the hypoglossal nerve more than the phrenic and recurrent laryngeal nerves (P less than 0.001). Isoproterenol and lobeline increased the activity of all three nerves (P less than 0.001) but stimulated the hypoglossal nerve more than the phrenic and recurrent laryngeal nerves (P less than 0.001). These relatively greater effects of all three agents on the hypoglossal nerve compared with the phrenic and the recurrent laryngeal nerves persisted under both hypoxic and hypercapnic conditions. After midcervical vagotomy, the responses of the hypoglossal to all three drugs remained larger than those of the phrenic nerve. After combined vagotomy and carotid sinus nerve section, the stimulatory effects of lobeline and the inhibitory effects of dopamine were no longer apparent. We conclude that it is possible to preferentially alter respiratory-related activity of the hypoglossal nerve compared with that of the phrenic nerve using agents that modify peripheral chemoreceptor activity.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online