Journal of Applied Physiology Add DOIs to your references at manuscript stage!
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 56: 404-410, 1984;
8750-7587/84 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Revelette, W. R.
Right arrow Articles by Wiley, R. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Revelette, W. R.
Right arrow Articles by Wiley, R. L.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 56, Issue 2 404-410, Copyright © 1984 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Effect of background loading on perception of inspiratory loads

W. R. Revelette, F. W. Zechman Jr, D. E. Parker and R. L. Wiley

The effect of background loading on magnitude estimation of added elastic and resistive inspiratory loads was determined. An analogous study involving estimation of the heaviness of weights in the hand was also performed. Perceptual performance was assessed using Stevens' power law psi = k phi n, where psi is the subjective magnitude, phi is the peak mouth pressure generated with an inspiratory load or the weight of the load in grams for the heaviness estimation, and the exponent n characterizes perceptual performance. The value of n was determined for the control and background conditions for each study. The results for both inspiratory loading studies and the heaviness estimation experiment indicate that background loading is associated with a significant increase in the exponent for magnitude estimation (P less than 0.05). Adjustment of the stimulus scale by subtracting the difference in peak mouth pressures generated during resting breathing between control and background-loaded conditions for the inspiratory loading studies, or the weight of the background load in the heaviness estimation experiment, converted the exponents obtained under background-loaded conditions to values that were not significantly different from those for control (P greater than 0.05). These results are consistent with the theory suggesting that an increase in detection threshold, produced by the background load, is responsible for the increase in exponent for magnitude estimation.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
W. Zhao, A. D. Martin, and P. W. Davenport
Magnitude estimation of inspiratory resistive loads by double-lung transplant recipients
J Appl Physiol, February 1, 2003; 94(2): 576 - 582.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online