Journal of Applied Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 56: 97-101, 1984;
8750-7587/84 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chapman, K. R.
Right arrow Articles by Rebuck, A. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chapman, K. R.
Right arrow Articles by Rebuck, A. S.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 56, Issue 1 97-101, Copyright © 1984 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Effect of posture on thoracoabdominal movements during CO2 rebreathing

K. R. Chapman and A. S. Rebuck

To determine whether the rib cage and abdomen-diaphragm contributions to tidal volume (VT) during CO2 rebreathing are affected by postural change, using respiratory inductive plethysmography, we measured in eight healthy volunteers the compartmental VT responses to progressive hypercapnia in both seated and supine postures. The ventilatory, frequency, and VT responses to CO2 of the total respiratory system were not significantly different between postures. VT responses, corrected for body size, ranged from 1.67 to 3.71% vital capacity (VC) X Torr-1 (mean 2.27) in seated subjects and from 1.08 to 3.79% VC X Torr-1 (mean 2.06), in supine subjects. In both postures, the VT response of the abdominal compartment was nearly uniform among subjects and independent of the total respiratory system VT response (slope = 0.091, r = 0.210 P greater than 0.3 seated; slope = 0.043, r = 0.077, P greater than 0.3 supine), whereas the VT response of the rib cage varied among subjects and was significantly correlated to the total VT response (slope = 0.815, r = 0.84, P less than 0.01, seated; slope = 1.125, r = 0.859, P less than 0.01, supine). Thus high tidal volume responses to CO2 rebreathing are determined largely by recruitment of the rib cage compartment in both seated and supine postures.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online