Journal of Applied Physiology Millar Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 56: 72-77, 1984;
8750-7587/84 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schaeffer, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Crandall, E. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schaeffer, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Crandall, E. D.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 56, Issue 1 72-77, Copyright © 1984 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Effects of cell swelling on fluid flow across alveolar epithelium

J. D. Schaeffer, K. J. Kim and E. D. Crandall

The effects of decreased temperature, metabolic inhibition, and hyposmolality on osmotically and hydrostatically driven water flux across bullfrog alveolar epithelium were studied. Lungs were isolated from double-pithed Rana catesbeiana and prepared as sacs. Either an osmotic (0.1 M raffinose) or hydrostatic (6.3-6.6 Torr) pressure gradient was imposed across the tissue. These gradients resulted in the volume flow of water from the alveolar to pleural bath. Control water flux and hydraulic conductivity were estimated from the rate of weight loss of the lung sac. Subsequently water flux and hydraulic conductivity were determined under one of the following conditions: 1) temperature of bathing solutions lowered to 2 degrees C; 2) 1 mM 2,4-dinitrophenol added to both alveolar and pleural baths, or 3) both baths changed to half-isosmotic Ringer solution. The control hydraulic conductivities for osmotic (Lpo) and hydrostatic (Lph) pressure gradients were 3.65(+/- 0.94) X 10(-12) and 2.14(+/- 0.63) X 10(-10) ml/dyn X s, respectively. Under conditions of metabolic inhibition, hyposmolality, and decreased temperature, Lph decreased by 77, 83, and 92%, and Lpo decreased by 56, 34, and 59%, respectively. These results are most consistent with the hypothesis that the decrements in hydraulic conductivity under our experimental conditions are due to epithelial cell swelling and perhaps to changes in the characteristics of the paracellular pathway.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online