Journal of Applied Physiology Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 56: 187-195, 1984;
8750-7587/84 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Breen, P. H.
Right arrow Articles by Wood, L. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Breen, P. H.
Right arrow Articles by Wood, L. D.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 56, Issue 1 187-195, Copyright © 1984 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

High-frequency ventilation in lung edema: effects on gas exchange and perfusion

P. H. Breen, J. Ali and L. D. Wood

In six open-chest dogs, unilobar pulmonary edema was induced by injection of oleic acid into a lower lobe pulmonary arterial branch. Two hours later, intermittent positive-pressure ventilation (IPPV) and high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) at matched mean alveolar pressures (MAP) were compared at 30-min intervals. The edematous lobar venous admixture (Qva/QT) increased by 0.14 (P less than 0.1) and its relative perfusion (QL/QT) decreased by 0.03. (P less than 0.1) during HFOV compared with IPPV. In another six dogs the MAP was increased by 1.5 cmH2O during HFOV; now the edematous lobar Qva/QT decreased by 0.15 (P less than 0.03) and QL/QT increased by 0.03 (P less than 0.03) during HFOV compared with IPPV. Greater MAP during HFOV also improved the edematous lobar ventilation (lobar venous PCO2) during HFOV compared with IPPV. Conceivably, the increase in MAP inflated collapsed, flooded regions, and thereby increased their O2 transfer, perfusion, and ventilation. Whole-lung Qva/QT was similar during IPPV and HFOV in both groups because of the opposing effects of lobar Qva/QT and QL/QT. We conclude that HFOV supports cardiovascular-respiratory function in open-chest unilobar pulmonary edema compared with IPPV at similar MAP; gas exchange and perfusion of edematous units may be sensitive to small changes in MAP, and we detected no intrinsic effects of HFOV on these variables. We speculate that similar beneficial effects in diffuse pulmonary edema may be effected by small variations in MAP during HFOV without the barotrauma side effects sometimes observed when MAP is increased during IPPV.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online