Journal of Applied Physiology Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

J Appl Physiol 56: 122-128, 1984;
8750-7587/84 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sestier, M.
Right arrow Articles by Malo, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sestier, M.
Right arrow Articles by Malo, J. L.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 56, Issue 1 122-128, Copyright © 1984 by American Physiological Society

ARTICLES

Bronchial responsiveness to methacholine and effects of respiratory maneuvers

M. Sestier, L. Pineau, A. Cartier, R. R. Martin and J. L. Malo

Eight asthmatic and six normal subjects had methacholine chloride inhalation tests on two visits. On first assessment the provocative concentration causing a 20% fall in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (PC20FEV1) was measured. On the second visit the provocative concentration causing a 35% fall in specific lung conductance (PC35sGL) was obtained in addition to the PC20FEV1. Lung resistance was continuously monitored to evaluate the bronchomotor effect of FEV1 maneuver. Results of PC20FEV1 were within one single twofold concentration on the two visits. In all subjects but one PC35sGL was lower than PC20FEV1, and in 10 instances this difference was superior to a single twofold concentration. The bronchodilator effect of FEV1 maneuver was significantly although loosely related to base-line airway caliber and excitability. However, we were unable to show a significant relationship between the differences between PC20FEV1 and PC35sGL and this bronchodilator effect. This suggests that other factors may explain the greater sensitivity of PC35sGL compared with PC20FEV1.




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online