Journal of Applied Physiology Journal of Applied Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 55: 1373-1378, 1983;
8750-7587/83 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jefferies, A. L.
Right arrow Articles by O'Brodovich, H. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jefferies, A. L.
Right arrow Articles by O'Brodovich, H. M.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 55, Issue 5 1373-1378, Copyright © 1983 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Effect of high-frequency oscillation on lung lymph flow

A. L. Jefferies, P. Hamilton and H. M. O'Brodovich

We investigated the effect of high-frequency oscillation (HFO) on lung lymphatic function under normal conditions and when lung lymph flow was increased by air microembolization. In six experiments, sheep and goats with chronic lung lymph fistulas and vascular catheters were anesthetized, paralyzed, intubated, and ventilated according to the following protocol: 1) intermittent positive-pressure ventilation (IPPV) for 1 h, 2) HFO with a frequency of 15 Hz and an estimated tidal volume of 1-2 ml/kg for 1-2 h, and 3) IPPV for 0.5 h. Ventilator settings were adjusted to maintain arterial Po2 above 100 Torr and a normal arterial Pco2. Vascular, esophageal, and mean airway pressures were monitored continuously. Lymph flow and cardiac output were recorded every 15 min. With this protocol, there were no changes in pulmonary vascular or esophageal pressures, and lymph flow remained stable throughout the experiment. In an additional five experiments, air microemboli were infused for approximately 30 min during HFO. Left atrial pressure was unchanged and lymph flow tripled. This response was qualitatively and quantitatively similar to that previously reported for unanesthetized spontaneously breathing sheep. We conclude that HFO does not impair lymphatic function under resting conditions and that lymphatics retain their ability to increase water and protein clearance during HFO.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online