Journal of Applied Physiology Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 54: 1618-1623, 1983;
8750-7587/83 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fanta, C. H.
Right arrow Articles by Brown, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fanta, C. H.
Right arrow Articles by Brown, R.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 54, Issue 6 1618-1623, Copyright © 1983 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Maximal shortening of inspiratory muscles: effect of training

C. H. Fanta, D. E. Leith and R. Brown

Normal subjects can increase their vital capacity by appropriate training. We tested whether that change can be achieved by greater maximal shortening of the inspiratory muscles without concomitant increases in peak static inspiratory pressures. Sixteen healthy volunteers participated in the study: eight were randomly assigned to make 20 inhalations to total lung capacity, held for 10 s with the glottis open, each day for 6 wk; the remainder served as nontraining controls. Before and after the 6-wk study period, we made multiple determinations of lung volumes and of curves relating lung volume to maximal static inspiratory (and expiratory) pressure. Control subjects had no significant changes from base line in any variable. In the training group, the mean vital capacity increased 200 +/- 74 ml (P less than 0.05) or 3.9 +/- 1.3% (P less than 0.02), without a significant change in residual volume. After training, the mean maximal inspiratory pressure at the airway opening (PI) at a lung volume equal to the base-line total lung capacity was 27 +/- 8 cmH2O in this group (vs. zero before training; P less than 0.02). Values of PI in the mid-vital capacity range did not change. We conclude that in response to appropriate training stimuli inspiratory muscles can contract to shorter minimal lengths, a capacity potentially important in progressive pulmonary hyperinflation.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
V. A. DePalo, A. L. Parker, F. Al-Bilbeisi, and F. D. McCool
Respiratory muscle strength training with nonrespiratory maneuvers
J Appl Physiol, February 1, 2004; 96(2): 731 - 734.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
F. AL-BILBEISI and F. DENNIS McCOOL
Diaphragm Recruitment during Nonrespiratory Activities
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., August 1, 2000; 162(2): 456 - 459.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online