Journal of Applied Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 54: 1482-1488, 1983;
8750-7587/83 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, J. V.
Right arrow Articles by Bruce, E. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, J. V., Jr
Right arrow Articles by Bruce, E. N.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 54, Issue 6 1482-1488, Copyright © 1983 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Transient ventilatory response to CO2 as a function of sleep state in full-term infants

J. V. Anderson Jr, R. J. Martin, E. F. Abboud, I. Z. Dyme and E. N. Bruce

The influence of sleep state on the transient (i.e., initial 60 s) and steady-state ventilatory responses to 2% CO2 inhalation was studied in 19 healthy full-term infants. A nasal mask pneumotachometer was used to measure ventilation and end-tidal CO2 partial pressure (PCO2) and enabled abrupt changes in the inspired gas concentration to be made. The magnitude of the change in minute ventilation for both the transient and steady-state responses to CO2 was not statistically different between active (AS) and quiet (QS) sleep. Nonetheless the greater variability in minute ventilation during AS compared with QS continued throughout the period of CO2 inhalation and was associated with a more variable change in ventilation in the individual infants during AS. There was a greater increase in end-tidal PCO2 over the first 60 s during AS (3.3 +/- 0.3 vs. 2.6 +/- 0.2 Torr, in AS and QS, respectively, P less than 0.03). This may indicate a smaller initial increase in alveolar ventilation, relative to CO2 delivery to the lungs, in response to CO2 inhalation during AS. Asynchronous chest wall movements were more common during AS than QS (P less than 0.005) and did not change with CO2. The inconsistent transient ventilatory response to CO2 during AS compared with QS may be important in the behavior of infants to spontaneous episodes of hypercapnia occurring during AS.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online