Journal of Applied Physiology Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 54: 1261-1268, 1983;
8750-7587/83 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lloyd, T. C.
Right arrow Articles by Cooper, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lloyd, T. C., Jr
Right arrow Articles by Cooper, J. A.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 54, Issue 5 1261-1268, Copyright © 1983 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Effect of diaphragm contraction on canine heart and pericardium

T. C. Lloyd Jr and J. A. Cooper

Pericardiophrenic attachments transmit diaphragm contraction to the pericardium. We investigated this in two ways. 1) We replaced the hearts of externally perfused dogs with a balloon from which we measured pressure changes. Diaphragm contraction increased pressure from 4.6 to 5.5 Torr, equivalent to an isobaric volume decrease of 1.5%, and decreased volumetric compliance by 3%. 2) We selectively servo controlled right atrial pressure, left atrial pressure, or cardiac output in open-chest dogs and monitored the effect of diaphragm contraction on cardiovascular and abdominal pressures, cardiac output, and the volume of blood added to or withdrawn from the circulation to achieve servo control. Diaphragm contraction decreased left atrial pressure 0.4 Torr when right atrial pressure was controlled and right atrial pressure increased 0.2 Torr while controlling left atrial pressure, but there were no significant changes in cardiac output. Atrial pressure did not change significantly when output was controlled. Servo control required removal of approximately 50 ml of blood, presumably reflecting a decreased splanchnic vascular capacity at the higher abdominal pressure. We conclude that the diaphragm may slightly tense the pericardium, but this has no important primary effect on the heart.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online