Journal of Applied Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 54: 290-303, 1983;
8750-7587/83 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gelfand, R.
Right arrow Articles by Puglia, C. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gelfand, R.
Right arrow Articles by Puglia, C. D.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 54, Issue 1 290-303, Copyright © 1983 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Human respiration at rest in rapid compression and at high pressures and gas densities

R. Gelfand, C. J. Lambertsen, R. Strauss, J. M. Clark and C. D. Puglia

Ventilation (V), end-tidal PCO2 (PACO2), and CO2 elimination rate were measured in men at rest breathing CO2-free gas over the pressure range 1-50 ATA and the gas density range 0.4-25 g/l, during slow and rapid compressions, at stable elevated ambient pressures and during slow decompressions in several phases of Predictive Studies III-1971 and Predictive Studies IV-1975. Inspired O2 was at or near natural O2 levels during compressions and at stable high pressures; it was 0.5 ATA during decompressions. Rapid compressions to high pressures did not impair respiratory homeostasis. Progressive increase in pulmonary gas flow resistance due to elevation of ambient pressure and inspired gas density to the He-O2 equivalent of 5,000 feet of seawater was not observed to progressively decrease resting V, or to progressively increase resting PACO2. Rather, a complex pattern of change in PACO2 was seen. As both ambient pressure and pulmonary gas flow resistance were progressively raised, PACO2 at first increased, went through a maximum, and then declined towards values near the 1 ATA level. It is suggested that this pattern of PACO2 change results from interaction on ventilation of 1) increase in pulmonary resistance due to elevation of gas density with 2) increase in respiratory drive postulated as due to generalized CNS excitation associated with exposure to high hydrostatic pressure. There may be a similar interaction between increased gas flow resistance and increase in respiratory drive related to nitrogen partial pressure and the narcosis resulting therefrom.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online