Journal of Applied Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 54: 130-133, 1983;
8750-7587/83 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sheppard, D.
Right arrow Articles by Boushey, H. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sheppard, D.
Right arrow Articles by Boushey, H. A.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 54, Issue 1 130-133, Copyright © 1983 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Effect of route of atropine delivery on bronchospasm from cold air and methacholine

D. Sheppard, J. Epstein, M. J. Holtzman, J. A. Nadel and H. A. Boushey

We undertook a study to determine whether the apparent disparity between the dose of inhaled atropine required to inhibit the bronchoconstriction induced by inhaled methacholine and the dose required to inhibit the bronchoconstriction induced by eucapnic hyperpnea with cold air is a function of the route of administration of atropine. In six subjects with asthma, we constructed dose-response curves to inhaled methacholine and to eucapnic hyperpnea with cold air after treatment with inhaled atropine (0.5 mg delivered) and intravenous placebo, with inhaled placebo and intravenous atropine (0.5 mg injected), and with inhaled and intravenous placebos. Atropine by either route shifted the dose-response curves to both cold air and to methacholine to the right. In every subject, however, inhaled atropine caused a markedly greater rightward shift of the inhaled methacholine dose-response curve than did intravenous atropine, whereas inhaled and intravenous atropine had similar effects on the cold air dose-response curve. These findings suggest that the apparent disparity between the doses of atropine required to inhibit methacholine- and cold air-induced bronchoconstriction may be a function of the route of administration of atropine and thus does not imply a nonmuscarinic action of atropine. The findings support the view that cold air causes bronchoconstriction via muscarinic pathways.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol.Home page
N. G. Verbout, J. K. Lorton, D. B. Jacoby, and A. D. Fryer
Atropine pretreatment enhances airway hyperreactivity in antigen-challenged guinea pigs through an eosinophil-dependent mechanism
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, May 1, 2007; 292(5): L1126 - L1135.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online