Journal of Applied Physiology Journal of Neurophysiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 53: 977-984, 1982;
8750-7587/82 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lemen, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Perrin, K. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lemen, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Perrin, K. J.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 53, Issue 4 977-984, Copyright © 1982 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Frequency spectra of flow and volume events for forced vital capacity

R. J. Lemen, C. B. Gerdes, M. J. Wegmann and K. J. Perrin

We determined the frequency content of forced expiratory flow-time (FT) and volume-time (VT) curves by a fast Fourier transform to determine the dynamic responses required of devices to reproduce these curves. We analyzed 304 FT and VT curves from 15 normal (N) subjects (ages 8-34 yr), 15 cystic fibrosis (CF) patients (ages 7-36 yr), and 9 smokers (S, ages 20-63 yr). The highest frequency (HF) with significant amplitude content, defined as the highest frequency with 5% or more amplitude of the fundamental, for FT curves in N (mean +/- SD, 5.06 +/- 0.7 Hz) was significantly (P less than 0.05) lower than in CF (6.43 +/- 0.9 Hz) and S (6.49 +/- 1.8 Hz). These differences were due predominantly to flow transients at high lung volumes in CF and S. No significant differences in HF of VT curves were noted among N (3.0 +/- 1.4 Hz), CF (2.9 +/- 1.4 Hz), and S (1.7 +/- 1.5 Hz). All subjects had HF for FT of 12 Hz or less and for VT of 6 Hz or less. For spirometric recordings our results suggest that the amplitude response of flow- and volume-measuring devices should be flat (+/- 5%) up to 12 Hz for flow signals and up to 6 Hz for volume signals.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online