Journal of Applied Physiology Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 53: 1034-1038, 1982;
8750-7587/82 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chen, H.
Right arrow Articles by Hainsworth, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chen, H.
Right arrow Articles by Hainsworth, R.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 53, Issue 4 1034-1038, Copyright © 1982 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Evaluation of a method for estimating cardiac output from a single breath in humans

H. Chen, N. P. Silverton and R. Hainsworth

We have modified the single-breath method of Kim et al. (J. Appl. Physiol. 21: 1338-1344, 1966) for estimating cardiac output and arterial and mixed venous carbon dioxide tensions (PCO2). We assessed this using 30 normal subjects and 23 cardiac patients. The procedure was performed satisfactorily in all but two patients. The random errors, from 60 pairs of estimates of cardiac output in normal subjects and 50 pairs in patients, were +/- 12.8 and +/- 19.6% (95% tolerance limits; i.e., coefficient of variation multiplied by 2 for n greater than 50). The systematic error was assessed in 15 patients from comparisons with results obtained by the direct Fick method. There was no significant difference except in two patients with large intracardiac shunts. Mean values of cardiac output by single-breath and direct Fick estimates were 3.80 and 3.83 l/min. Arterial and mixed venous PCO2 were estimated by the single-breath method with random errors of +/- 1.5 and +/- 1.4 Torr, respectively, and no significant systematic errors. We conclude that our modification of the single-breath method is reliable in humans at rest, although the procedures for delivering the breath and processing the data are of critical importance.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online