Journal of Applied Physiology Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 53: 392-396, 1982;
8750-7587/82 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Weiss, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Ingram, R. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Weiss, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Ingram, R. H., Jr

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 53, Issue 2 392-396, Copyright © 1982 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Parenteral vs. inhaled atropine: density dependence of maximal expiratory flow

J. W. Weiss, E. R. McFadden Jr and R. H. Ingram Jr

Using forced vital capacity maneuvers, we measured maximal expiratory flow rates (Vmax) and static elastic recoil pressures of the lung [Pst(L)] using quasi-static maneuvers in normal nonsmoking human subjects who were breathing air and after a washing of 80% helium-20% oxygen before and after both inhaled and intravenously administered atropine sulfate. By both routes there were equivalent increases in Vmaxair but different effects on density dependence (DD) of Vmax (DD = ratio of VmaxHeO2 to Vmaxair) and on Pst(L). At 30% of vital capacity, DD decreased from an average of 1.47 to 1.32 (P less than 0.01, paired t test) after inhaled drug and did not change after parenteral administration [1.44 vs. 1.48 (P greater than 0.2)]. After inhalation Pst(L) did not change, but after parenteral administration Pst(L) significantly decreased. We interpret these findings to indicate a predominantly large-airway effect with the inhalation route and a more uniform dilatation after the parenteral dose. These results contrast with beta-adrenergic dilatation following which small-airway effects predominate regardless of route of administration.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online