Journal of Applied Physiology AJP: Heart and Circulatory Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 52: 1008-1012, 1982;
8750-7587/82 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hensel, H.
Right arrow Articles by Banet, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hensel, H.
Right arrow Articles by Banet, M.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 52, Issue 4 1008-1012, Copyright © 1982 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Adaptive changes in cats after long-term exposure to various temperatures

H. Hensel and M. Banet

Two groups of cats were exposed to 5 and 30 degrees C, respectively for 24 mo in climatic chambers under artificial illumination. Then the ambient temperatures were reversed for both groups for another 36 mo. The group adapted to cold for 36 mo showed an increase in fur growth (+35%), an increase in resting metabolism (+20%), and a shift in threshold of the cold-induced metabolic response to 8 degrees C lower ambient temperatures. Norepinephrine (0.4 mg . kg-1) elicited nonshivering thermogenesis (+37%) in the cold-adapted animals but was ineffective in the warm-adapted ones. Fur insulation at thermoneutrality was 55% higher in the cold-adapted cats. During acute exposure to -5 degrees C, tissue insulation decreased in both groups; fur insulation increased by 34% in the warm-adapted cats but remained nearly constant in the cold-adapted animals. At all ambient temperatures cold-adapted cats had higher (+0.4 degrees C) rectal temperatures. Body weight was not significantly different in both groups, although the cats living in the cold had a 45% higher metabolism. This was compensated by an increased food consumption.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online