Journal of Applied Physiology Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 52: 562-569, 1982;
8750-7587/82 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Irvin, C. G.
Right arrow Articles by Macklem, P. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Irvin, C. G.
Right arrow Articles by Macklem, P. T.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 52, Issue 3 562-569, Copyright © 1982 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Nonpurinergic nature and efficacy of nonadrenergic bronchodilation

C. G. Irvin, R. R. Martin and P. T. Macklem

The nonadrenergic inhibition of airway smooth muscle was investigated in vivo in the anesthetized cat. We examined 1) the bronchodilatating nature of the selective purinergic agonists [adenosine (AD) and adenosine triphosphate (ATP)], 2) antagonistic nature of aminophylline and quinidine, and 3) the comparative efficacy of nonadrenergic and sympathetic inhibition in reversing bronchoconstriction induced with serotonin. Alterations in smooth muscle tone were studied via electrical stimulation of the vagus nerves and measurements of pulmonary resistance. We found that neither AD nor ATP, aerosolized or injected, altered the tonic bronchoconstriction. Dipyridamole, an AD reuptake inhibitor, did not alter the response to AD, ATP, or electrical stimulation. Both aminophylline and quinidine block nonadrenergic dilatation at high dose levels (69 and 29 mg/kg, respectively); further, both reputed antagonists impair cholinergic excitation. Nonadrenergic inhibition is equipotent to sympathetic inhibition in reversing bronchoconstriction; however, nonadrenergic inhibition is more prolonged (4.0 +/- 1.8 min). We conclude that probably neither ATP nor AD is the neurotransmitter for nonadrenergic bronchodilatation in the cat, and that nonadrenergic inhibition is both potent and long lasting.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
C. Y. Seow, W. Mitzner, C. G. Irvin, A. B. DuBois, B. T. Ameredes, R. A. Panettieri Jr., Y. Amrani, and S. Permutt
Point:Counterpoint Comments
J Appl Physiol, April 1, 2007; 102(4): 1712 - 1712.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
B. J. Canning
Reflex regulation of airway smooth muscle tone
J Appl Physiol, September 1, 2006; 101(3): 971 - 985.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online