Journal of Applied Physiology Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 52: 254-259, 1982;
8750-7587/82 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Scharf, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Brown, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Scharf, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Brown, R.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 52, Issue 1 254-259, Copyright © 1982 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Influence of the right ventricle on canine left ventricular function with PEEP

S. M. Scharf and R. Brown

In anesthetized dogs we evaluated the influence of increased right ventricular (RV) pressures on left ventricular (LV) function by comparing the hemodynamic effects of increases in RV afterload (pulmonary arterial pressure) produced by positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) with those due to pulmonary arterial occlusion (PAO). Left atrial (Pla) and right atrial (Pra) pressures increased with PEEP and PAO [for Pla: 3.1 +/- 0.7 Torr (PEEP), 2.4 +/- 0.9 Torr (PAO); for Pra: 2.9 +/- 0.4 Torr (PEEP), 3.1 +/- 1.2 Torr (PAO)]. RV septal-free wall dimension (RVD) increased, and LV septal-posterolateral dimension (L2) decreased with both conditions [increases in RVD: 1.9 +/- 0.3 mm (PEEP), 2.2 +/- 0.5 mm (PAO); decrease in L2: 1.1 +/- 0.4 mm (PEEP), 0.9 +/- 0.3 mm (PAO)]. Extracorporeal bypass of the great veins did not alter these findings. LV function curves showed less stroke work at any Pla during PEEP, this being unaffected by vagotomy. When the RV was bypassed, there were no PEEP or PAO related changes in Pla or LV function. Thus diminished LV function with PEEP is probably due to the influence on the LV of a stressed RV in this situation.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online