Journal of Applied Physiology Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 51: 1651-1656, 1981;
8750-7587/81 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Abraham, W. M.
Right arrow Articles by Sackner, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Abraham, W. M.
Right arrow Articles by Sackner, M. A.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 51, Issue 6 1651-1656, Copyright © 1981 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Differences in airway reactivity in normal and allergic sheep after exposure to sulfur dioxide

W. M. Abraham, W. Oliver Jr, M. J. Welker, M. M. King, A. Wanner and M. A. Sackner

The effect of breathing 5 ppm sulfur dioxide (SO2) on airway reactivity was studied in both normal and allergic conscious sheep. Allergic sheep were defined as animals in which inhalation of Ascaris suum extract resulted in bronchospasm as evidenced by an increase in mean pulmonary flow resistance (RL), hyperinflation, and a fall in dynamic compliance. Airway reactivity was assessed by measuring the increase of RL after 18 breaths of 0.25% carbachol (c), from an initial RL value obtained after 18 breaths of buffered saline (s) [RL(c-s)]. RL and RL(c-s) were determined prior to, immediately after, and 24 h after exposure to 5 ppm SO4 for 4 h. In both groups RL remained unchanged after SO2 exposure. Prior to exposure, RL(c-s) was not significantly different in seven normal (0.3 +/- 0.1) and seven allergic sheep [0.4 +/- 0.2 (SD) cmH2O X l-1 X s], and there was no significant change in RL (c-s) immediately after SO2 exposure in either group. Twenty-four h later, RL(c-s) RL(c-s) increased to 0.7 +/- 0.8 (P less than 0.2) in normal and to 1.8 +/- 0.9 cmH2O X l-1 X s (P less than 0.01) in allergic sheep. Because the increase in RL(c-s) after 24 h was greater (P less than 0.01) in allergic than in normal sheep, we conclude that SO2 exposure increased airway reactivity more in the former than in the latter.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online