Journal of Applied Physiology Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 51: 1574-1580, 1981;
8750-7587/81 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Winn, R.
Right arrow Articles by Hildebrandt, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Winn, R.
Right arrow Articles by Hildebrandt, J.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 51, Issue 6 1574-1580, Copyright © 1981 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Deficiencies in pore-membrane models of microvascular fluid and solute transudation

R. Winn, B. Nadir, J. Gleisner, J. Stothert and J. Hildebrandt

We have attempted to determine the membrane parameters, permeability-surface area product (PS) and reflection coefficient (sigma), necessary to describe solute exchange in the pulmonary circulation. Experimental lymph-to-plasma ratios were obtained for total protein (Rtot) and albumin (Ralb) using lung lymph collected from goats with chronic lung lymph fistulae. Lymph flow (QL) and solute flow (QS) were varied by increasing microvascular pressure in a stepwise manner by inflating a balloon in the left atrium. The increased QL and decreased Ralb from multiple experiments in four goats were used to plot PS vs. sigma using the equation of Patlak et al. (J. Theor. Biol. 5: 426-442, 1963). The region of intersection of two or more such curves should identify the two membrane constants. However, these curves rarely intersected suggesting that perhaps the lung barrier was not adequately represented by a single homoporous membrane. To evaluate heteroporosity, the three-pore model of Blake and Staub (Microvasc. Res. 12: 197-220, 1976) was investigated. By use of their pore sizes and relative pore distributions, values for the fluid filtration coefficient, PS, and sigma of each pore type were calculated, and finally QL and R were predicted at various microvascular pressures. When these calculated values of QL and R were plotted using the equation of Patlak et al., an equivalent homoporous PS and sigma could still be found. Therefore, a heteroporous membrane does not appear to explain the failure of our data plots to intersect. Possible alternative models are suggested.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online