Journal of Applied Physiology Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 51: 1232-1237, 1981;
8750-7587/81 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Williams, R. S.
Right arrow Articles by Wallace, A. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Williams, R. S.
Right arrow Articles by Wallace, A. G.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 51, Issue 5 1232-1237, Copyright © 1981 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Autonomic mechanisms of training bradycardia: beta-adrenergic receptors in humans

R. S. Williams, R. S. Eden, M. E. Moll, R. M. Lester and A. G. Wallace

To address the autonomic mechanisms underlying the bradycardia of physical training in human subjects, we performed a cross-sectional study comparing the heart-rate responses to graded doses of isoproterenol in 7 elite marathon runners and 7 age-matched controls, and a longitudinal study in 12 normal volunteers of the effects of 6 wk of intense physical training on lymphocyte beta-adrenergic receptors identified by l-[3H]dihydroalprenolol. We observed no significant differences between marathoners and controls in the dose of isoproterenol that produced a 25-beat/min increment in heart rate, either in the absence (1.9 +/- 0.6 vs. 2.5 +/- 0.6 microgram; P, 0.509) or in the presence of cholinergic blockade (4.4 +/- 1.3 vs. 3.1 +/- 0.4 microgram: P, 0.320). Likewise, we observed no effects of physical training on lymphocyte beta-adrenergic receptors in terms of receptors number (53 +/- 11 vs. 56 +/- 10 fmol/mg protein) or receptor affinity (Kd 4.0 +/- 0.7 vs. 3.6 +/- 0.7 nM) (P, 0.9178). Although our data cannot exclude reduced chronotropic sensitivity to catecholamines as contributing to lowered heart rate in some highly conditioned individuals, these results are consistent with the hypothesis that altered neuronal input to the sinus node is usually a more important mechanism of training bradycardia.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online