Journal of Applied Physiology AJP citation statistics
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 51: 922-928, 1981;
8750-7587/81 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Arieli, R.
Right arrow Articles by Van Liew, H. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Arieli, R.
Right arrow Articles by Van Liew, H. D.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 51, Issue 4 922-928, Copyright © 1981 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Postinspiratory mixing in the lung and cardiogenic oscillations

R. Arieli, A. J. Olszowka and H. D. Van Liew

Subjects inspired a 300-ml bolus of indicator gas cocktail (5% each of SF6, Ar, Ne, and He) form residual volume (RV), then inspired air to functional residual capacity (FRC). There was no evidence that a 10-s breath hold changed the relative concentrations or amounts of indicator gases in phases III and IV of expiration or allowed additional gas to mix into the RV, but the breath hold caused cardiogenic oscillations (CO) in expired gas to decrease in height. The units responsible for cardiogenic troughs and peaks are different from the units responsible for phases III and IV, respectively, in that the oscillation troughs had a lower He/SF6 ratio than the peaks whereas phase III had a higher He/SF6 than phase IV. We explain the CO as due to variation in mechanical properties, leading to variation in response to the pressure wave caused by the heart, in units that are relatively near to each other. We conclude that there is little or no postinspiratory mixing between distant lung units, but the dampening of CO suggests that units that are close to each other can mix if time is allowed.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online