Journal of Applied Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 51: 262-269, 1981;
8750-7587/81 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jammes, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Milic-Emili, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jammes, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Milic-Emili, J.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 51, Issue 2 262-269, Copyright © 1981 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Ventilatory responses to muscular vibrations in healthy humans

Y. Jammes, M. J. Mathiot, J. P. Roll, C. Prefaut, F. Berthelin, C. Grimaud and J. Milic-Emili

In healthy humans, we studied the effect of high-frequency mechanical vibrations applied unilaterally to the tendon of the biceps or triceps brachialis on ventilation and the breathing pattern. This stimulus preferentially activates the muscle spindle afferents. Increase of respiratory frequency and changes in the ventilatory timing started at the first or second inspiration during tendon stimulation, and no adaptation occurred as long as the vibrations continued. The tidal volume and mean inspiratory flow rate were only enhanced in individuals having high-frequency breathing during eupnea. The changes in ventilatory variables were observed when the motor response to vibrations was tested under isometric or isotonic conditions. Various experimental procedures enabled us to induce a tonic reflex contraction in either the vibrated muscle or the antagonist of no reflex contraction in either group of muscles. In all cases the increase in minute ventilation was identical. These changes in breathing pattern was not associated with a significant decrease in alveolar CO2 pressure and did not seem to be responsible for important variations in respiratory gas exchanges. The response to high-frequency vibrations was also studied after ventilation was increased with added dead space. The magnitude of hyperventilation an the pattern of ventilatory response produced by tendon stimulation did not change with increased ventilation. In conclusion, the stimulation of muscle spindles in human induces changes in ventilation and pattern of breathing , and the occurrence of a reflex muscular contraction does not seem necessary in order to obtain such effects.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online