Journal of Applied Physiology Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 51: 243-247, 1981;
8750-7587/81 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Van Liew, H. D.
Right arrow Articles by Sponholtz, D. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Van Liew, H. D.
Right arrow Articles by Sponholtz, D. K.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 51, Issue 2 243-247, Copyright © 1981 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Hindrance to diffusive gas mixing in the lung in hyperbaric environments

H. D. Van Liew, E. D. Thalmann and D. K. Sponholtz

Diffusivity of a gas is inversely proportional to atmospheric pressure. We studied pulmonary gas mixing in hyperbaric environments (5.5 and 9.5 ATA) as a means of understanding the role played by diffusion in normal situations and also as a means of determining whether persons in hyperbaric environments will be handicapped by poor diffusive mixing. Our subjects took single breaths of a mixture of indicator gases (5% each of SF6, Ar, Ne, and He; 20% O2, balance N2). Recordings of expired volumes and concentrations showed that heavier indicators were less well mixed than lighter ones, as evidenced by a slower fall during the transition between dead space and "alveolar" gas and a steeper slope of the alveolar plateau. Differences between light and heavy gases increased as pressure increased. Amounts of the indicators retained in the functional residual capacity (FRC) or residual volume after a single breath had a weak positive relation to diffusivity; the amounts (A) in the FRC (as fraction of inspired amounts) were well fitted by a simple equation. ARFC/AI = 0.55 - (0.0010/D), where D is molecular diffusivity. We conclude that the changes of distribution of inspired gas that occur with large changes of diffusivity have only a minor effect on the amount of gas exchanged between the inspirate and residual gas in the FRC.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online