Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 51, Issue 1 218-225, Copyright © 1981 by American Physiological Society

ARTICLES

Fluid dynamic factors in tracheal pressure measurement

H. K. Chang and J. P. Mortola

Because tracheal pressure measurement generally involves the use of a cannula or an endotracheal tube, fluid dynamic factors may cause a considerable artifact. We present a theoretical explanation of the observed apparent paradox in which the resistance of a tracheal cannula or an endotracheal tube is isolation was found to exceed the resistance of the airways plus the cannula or the tube in situ. By estimating the viscous dissipation and the kinetic energy change in a conduit with sudden variation of cross-sectional area, a predictive model is derived. The predictions are verified by a series of in vitro experiments with both steady and oscillatory flows. The experiments showed that the pressure recorded from the sidearm of a tracheal cannula or endotracheal tube contains an error which, in general, increased with the mean Reynolds' number of the through flow and also depends on the diameter ratio between the trachea and the tube or cannula, the position of the pressure tap, and the frequency of ventilation. When feasible, direct measurement with a needle in the trachea is suggested as a way to avoid the possible artifacts arising from the use fo a side tap of the cannula. Theoretical considerations, as well as in vitro and animal experiments, indicate that adding a properly chosen expansion to the tracheal cannula makes it possible to alter inspiratory and expiratory pressures selectively. This device may prove useful in control of breathing studies.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. L. Farias, D. S. Faffe, D. G. Xisto, M. C. E. Santana, R. Lassance, L. F. M. Prota, M. B. Amato, M. M. Morales, W. A. Zin, and P. R. M. Rocco Positive end-expiratory pressure prevents lung mechanical stress caused by recruitment/derecruitment J Appl Physiol, January 1, 2005; 98(1): 53 - 61. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Baydur, G. Kanel, and M. Koss Tracheobronchomalacia and Noninvasive Ventilation Revisited Chest, October 1, 2004; 126(4): 1390 - 1392. [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Lichtwarck-Aschoff, A. Helmer, R. Kawati, M. Lattuada, U. H. Sjostrand, N. Zugel, J. Guttmann, and G. Hedenstierna Good short-term agreement between measured and calculated tracheal pressure Br. J. Anaesth., August 1, 2003; 91(2): 239 - 248. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. Mitzner, C. Tankersley, L. K. A. Lundblad, A. Adler, C. G. Irvin, and J. H. T. Bates Interpreting Penh in mice J Appl Physiol, February 1, 2003; 94(2): 828 - 832. [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. C. F. Correa, P. B. Ciminelli, H. Falcao, B. J. C. Alcantara, R. S. Contador, A. S. Medeiros, W. A. Zin, and P. R. M. Rocco Respiratory mechanics and lung histology in normal rats anesthetized with sevoflurane J Appl Physiol, August 1, 2001; 91(2): 803 - 810. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. L.S. Menezes, P. S.C. Chagas, A. V. Macedo-Neto, V. C.T. Santos, P. R.M. Rocco, and W. A. Zin Suture or Prosthetic Reconstruction of Experimental Diaphragmatic Defects Chest, May 1, 2000; 117(5): 1443 - 1448. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. Habre, P. Scalfaro, C. Sims, K. Tiller, and P. D. Sly Respiratory Mechanics During Sevoflurane Anesthesia in Children With and Without Asthma Anesth. Analg., November 1, 1999; 89(5): 1177 - 1177. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. J. Pillow, H. Neil, M. H. Wilkinson, and C. A. Ramsden Effect of I/E ratio on mean alveolar pressure during high-frequency oscillatory ventilation J Appl Physiol, July 1, 1999; 87(1): 407 - 414. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]