Journal of Applied Physiology Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 51: 148-153, 1981;
8750-7587/81 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Miles, D. S.
Right arrow Articles by Horvath, S. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Miles, D. S.
Right arrow Articles by Horvath, S. M.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 51, Issue 1 148-153, Copyright © 1981 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Hypoxia effects on plasma volume shifts at rest, work, and recovery in supine posture

D. S. Miles, D. R. Bransford and S. M. Horvath

The purpose of this study was to determine the effects acute exposure to hypoxia (less than 1.5 h; gas mixture 12.6% O2-87.4% N2) has on plasma volume (PV) shifts during rest and exercise. Nine unacclimatized males performed identical protocols in the supine posture in both normoxic (N) and hypoxic (H) conditions. The protocol was rest 60 min, submaximal exercise (PWC 140, work rate eliciting a heart rate of 140 beats/min) for 30 min, immediately followed by maximal exercise, and 10 min of passive recovery. There were slight but significant losses of 2.7 and 1.4% PV at rest in H and N conditions, respectively. At the same relative intensity of submaximal exercise (work loads reduced by 22% in H conditions), PV losses were nearly identical (N = 11.2%, H = 11.8%). There was a further PV efflux subsequent to maximal exercise (N = 7.9%, H = 5.2%). The maximum PV efflux, from the beginning of rest to the end of maximal exercise, was 20% for both conditions. Total plasma protein (PP) content was unchanged during rest or exercise for either N or H conditions. After 10 min of recovery, restitution of PV was 10% below preexercise values for both N and H conditions. We conclude that acute hypoxic exposure does not influence the loss of VP or PP during submaximal or maximal exercise.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online